RE[4]: WPF is slow as hell
OS News - 10 Aug 2008
WPF is probably really good to write these kinds of applications because it lets people who are more familiar with markup write rich client applications. ...

RE[4]: WPF is slow as hell
OS News - 42 minutes ago
WPF is probably really good to write these kinds of applications because it lets people who are more familiar with markup write rich client applications. ...
Published Aug 07, 2008 in Latest News

RE[4]: Now maybe....
OS News - 1 hour ago
... they only certify this for a limited set of distros but it should work on anything) is to write/port your application to the Eclipse Rich Client Platform.
Published Aug 07, 2008 in Latest News

RE[4]: Now maybe....
OS News - 12 hours ago
... they only certify this for a limited set of distros but it should work on anything) is to write/port your application to the Eclipse Rich Client Platform.
Published Aug 07, 2008 in Latest News

RE[4]: Now maybe....
OS News - 6 Aug 2008
... they only certify this for a limited set of distros but it should work on anything) is to write/port your application to the Eclipse Rich Client Platform.

RE[3]: This is cool and all but
OS News - 3 hours ago
Have you ever used Matlab? Even ignoring Simulink for which there no alternative, the following are the features which I find Octave to be lacking in: 1) ...
Tagged under: ,

RE[3]: This is cool and all but
OS News - 14 hours ago
Have you ever used Matlab? Even ignoring Simulink for which there no alternative, the following are the features which I find Octave to be lacking in: 1) ...
Tagged under: ,
Published Jun 01, 2008 in Latest News

opera 9.50 -> ff3
OS News - 1 hour ago
... impressions [all *very* subjective to my browsing habbits]: - google pages are all supported and have a 'better', 'more rich-client like' feel to them. ...
Published May 09, 2008 in Latest News

RE: how come???
OS News - 2 hours ago
SkyOS: Okay Innovative, but low-level is more important. If people can't run your OS then why create apps?? What do you mean "can't run"? ...
Tagged under: